Connect with us

Africa

Media Probe Reveals Israel Funded Ethiopian Journalists to Whitewash Genocide

Published

on

An Al Jazeera investigative story exposed Israel-funded trips involving Ethiopian journalists, used to create narrative that whitewashed its genocide in Gaza, with similar trips funded from South Africa & Kenya, amid intensifying debate on media ethics & transparency.

Al Jazeera’s “The Listening Post” has sharpened scrutiny of foreign-sponsored media access, centering on Ethiopia, South Africa and Kenya. The segment questioned disclosure practices, editorial balance, and the framing of Gaza war coverage by journalists who joined trips funded by Israel’s Foreign Ministry.

Ethiopia As The Focal Point

The program exposed that more than 20 Ethiopian journalists traveled to Israel on fully funded visits organized by Israel’s Foreign Ministry.

The trips involved reporters & media personalities from 10 Ethiopian media organizations, with their subsequent reporting largely reflecting official Israeli narratives, while Palestinian perspectives were absent.

Artificial intelligence researcher Timnit Gebru, interviewed for the segment, said “Ethiopian journalists who traveled to Israel do not deserve the title of journalist.”

She linked the concern not only to disclosure and balance, but to broader credibility risks within Ethiopia’s media environment, which allegedly were constrained and politically pressured.

Balance, Access, And Narrative Choices

The Listening Post said coverage emphasized visits to Christian holy sites and interviews with Israeli officials, including members of the Knesset and figures associated with the ruling Likud party. It asserted that “no airtime” was allocated to Palestinian voices.

Gebru commented that journalists who interviewed Israeli civilians and authorities did not engage with representatives of Gaza’s civilian population.

We have repeatedly seen Ethiopian journalists speak about Israelis kidnapped by Hamas or about the October 7 attack. One documentary gave half its time to a young Israeli eyewitness. They did not interview a single Palestinian.

AI Researcher Timnit Gberu

Symbolism Of The Border Visit

The program referenced footage aired by Ethiopian Broadcaster EBS showing presenters traveling to the Israel-Gaza border fence.

Yonás Kebede, an EBS presenter, was quoted saying, “Israel is not only joy but also sadness… we heard stories that touch the human heart.”

The Listening Post framed the remark as emblematic of what it described as an imbalance in narrative emphasis.

Gebru argued that even without entering Gaza, journalists could have interviewed Palestinians inside Israel. She noted that “finding Palestinians in Israel is easy” and suggested that source selection reflects editorial priorities rather than logistical barriers.

South Africa And Kenya In Context

The program also recalled that three South African journalists traveled to Israel with expenses covered by the South African Jewish Board of Deputies (SAJBD). Following complaints, the Press Council of South Africa ruled ethical guidelines had been breached due to nondisclosure.

When questioned, Sunday Times editor Makhudu Sefara said the omission occurred because they had “forgotten.”

Trips for Kenyans

Kenya was cited through a separate example involving approximately 10 TikTok creators and Christian gospel singers who visited Israel. Kenyan legal analyst Njahira Gitahi observed that many Kenyan Christians view Israel primarily as a sacred place. She said some believe, “because Christ was born in Israel, we must stand with Israel.”

Ethics And Institutional Credibility

The program questioned the role of the Ethiopian Media Council. It noted that Tamrat Haylu, identified as a board leadership member of the council, was among journalists who traveled to Israel, which raises serous concerns about perceived independence and accountability mechanisms.

The broadcast concluded that disclosure, funding transparency, and source diversity remain central tests of journalistic credibility, particularly in conflict reporting.

According to The Listening Post, Ethiopian journalists were invited to respond to the allegations, but none agreed to appear.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Africa

Ethiopia’s UN Vote on Israeli Settlement Sparks Criticism & Confusion at Home

Published

on

Ethiopia voted ‘NO’ on UN Human Rights Council resolution condemning Israeli settlements in Palestine, sparking domestic backlash for shifting its decade long diplomatic stand. Critics say the shift is a blow to Ethiopia’s historic resistance against colonialism & Apartheid.

Ethiopia’s split voting at the United Nations Human Rights Council has triggered domestic backlash, exposing tensions between its historic pro-Palestinian stance and evolving strategic alignments.

At the UNHRC 61st session, Ethiopia voted “No” on resolution A/HRC/61/L.36 condemning Israeli settlements, joining only 2 other countries – the Czech Republic and North Macedonia – against 34 in favor and 10 abstentions.

At the same session, Addis Ababa backed resolution A/HRC/61/L.37 affirming Palestinian self-determination, causing further confusion. The divergence has drawn scrutiny, particularly as most African states supported the settlements resolution.

The vote sparked criticism among Ethiopians, many questioning a perceived break from the country’s anti-colonial legacy and support for anti-apartheid struggle.

Social media reactions also highlighted confusion over aligning with Israel “at a time the whole world is condemning Israel,” while others demanded official clarification.

Critics framed the move as inconsistent with Ethiopia’s historic identity as a symbol of resistance to colonial domination in Africa and elsewhere, and its historic support to Nelson Mandela in his struggle against Apartheid.

Some believe Ethiopia’s voting record on Palestine-related resolutions shows pattern. In December 2017, Ethiopia voted in favor of rejecting the U.S. recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. By May 2021, it abstained during an emergency UNGA session on Gaza.

In December 2022, it supported Palestinian self-determination but abstained on an International Court of Justice request on Israel’s occupation.

In September 2025, it again abstained on the New York Accord, which passed 142–10 with 12 abstentions.

Some argue this pattern reflects a dual-track strategy of backing Palestinian statehood while avoiding positions that could strain ties with Israel and Western partners, which critics say is a compromise too costly for Ethiopia’s status in African socio politics.

Officials frame the approach as balancing ties. Ethiopia maintains security and technology cooperation with Israel while relying on Western aid and investment, particularly from the United States.

At the same time, as host of the African Union, it remains tied to continental support for Palestinian statehood.

Speculation in Ethiopian political circles has pointed to possible Gulf influence, particularly from the United Arab Emirates, in shaping Addis Ababa’s deviance from its historic diplomatic stance.

The UAE has become a key economic and security partner, and its deepening ties with Israel have shaped popular belief that Ethiopia’s UN voting may reflect alignment within this emerging regional axis.

This debate has been amplified by a recent Al Jazeera report that raised questions over whether Ethiopia could be part of a so-called “Hexagon” alliance – an informal network allegedly linking Israel with select states across the Red Sea and Horn of Africa.

While unconfirmed, the framework is described as focusing on security coordination and strategic positioning in a contested region. Within this context, Ethiopia’s vote is seen by some observers as part of a broader recalibration rather than an isolated shift.

At the same time, officials continue to signal support for a two-state solution, suggesting Addis Ababa is attempting to balance new partnerships without fully abandoning its traditional diplomatic posture.

Continue Reading

Africa

“Democracy Kills” – Burkina Faso Leader Tells Public to Forget Election

Published

on

Burkina Faso’s military leadership has moved further away from its stated democratic transition, with leader Ibrahim Traore openly rejecting democratic governance while consolidating control amid worsening insecurity.

Speaking on state television Thursday, Traore said: “People need to forget about the issue of democracy… democracy isn’t for us.”

He added: “Democracy kills” and “Democracy is slavery,” citing Libya as an example of failed externally imposed governance models.

The remarks mark a sharp departure from earlier commitments to restore civilian rule following the September 2022 coup.

The junta has dismantled key political structures. In January, more than 100 political parties were dissolved and their assets seized.

Parliament had already been suspended, while the Independent National Electoral Commission was scrapped in July 2025 on cost grounds.

Elections initially promised for 2024 were postponed, with authorities stating voting cannot occur until the entire country is secured.

Traore justified the shift as necessary to confront armed terror groups linked to Daesh. However, violence has intensified rather than receded. Fatalities have tripled since his takeover, reaching 17,775 by May, compared with 6,630 deaths in the preceding 3 years, according to the Africa Center for Strategic Studies.

Hundreds of thousands have been displaced as armed groups expand territorial control.

Burkina Faso has aligned with neighboring military governments in Mali and Niger, which have taken similar steps against political parties.

All 3 countries exited ECOWAS in January to form the Alliance of Sahel States (AES).

They have also pivoted toward Russian paramilitary support after expelling approximately 5,000 French troops previously deployed in the region.

Critics point to growing pressure on institutions. Journalists, opposition figures, and legal professionals have been forcibly conscripted and sent to front lines in recent months.

Some were later released, but the measures have raised concerns about the erosion of civil and legal protections.

Continue Reading

Africa

RSF Drone Strike on Sudan Hospital Kills 10, Including Hospital Leadership

Published

on

RSF drone strikes hit al-Jabalain Hospital in Sudan’s White Nile, killing 10 including 7 staff, while a separate report cites RSF forces storming a hospital in El Daein, underscoring deliberate attacks on healthcare facilities.

Attacks on healthcare infrastructure in Sudan are intensifying, with drone strikes and ground assaults on hospitals signaling a widening pattern of targeting medical facilities amid an escalating conflict.

Doctors Without Borders (MSF) said the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) carried out 2 drone strikes on al-Jabalain Hospital in White Nile province on Thursday, hitting an operating theater and a maternity ward.

At least 10 people were killed, including 7 medical staff, and 19 others were injured. Patients were transferred to a hospital in Kosti, approximately 50 miles (80 km) away.

MSF said: “The attack is even more appalling as it occurred during a children’s immunization campaign.”

The strike disrupted both emergency care and routine services, compounding pressure on an already strained healthcare system.

A hospital staff member, Salah Moussa, described the sequence of events. “I rushed to the hospital when I heard the explosion… another drone strike was launched and I got hit and lost consciousness,” he told AP.

Sudan’s information minister Khalid Aleisir condemned the attack and called for designating the RSF a terrorist organization.

“We also hold regional backers directly responsible… including advanced weaponry and unmanned aerial systems,” he said.

The attack killed senior personnel, including the hospital’s general manager and administrative manager. Moussa said: “The hospital lost all its medical and administrative leadership in this attack.”

The first explosion occurred around 11 a.m., followed by a second strike as staff attempted to evacuate injured colleagues, indicating a double-strike pattern.

Sudan Doctors Network described the incident as a “deliberate assault on health facilities and unarmed civilians.”

Emergency Lawyers said additional strikes targeted a medical supply depot in Rabak, the capital of White Nile province, pointing to a broader effort affecting healthcare logistics.

In a separate incident, Sudan Doctors Network said RSF-affiliated forces stormed Family Hospital in El Daein, East Darfur, assaulting medical staff and destroying equipment.

The group said personnel were beaten and facilities damaged, calling it “a blatant violation of the sanctity of healthcare facilities.” It added that the attack occurred amid “a complete absence of any intervention from the responsible authorities.”

The incidents underscore a deepening pattern of attacks on healthcare infrastructure by UAE-backed RSF militia, further eroding Sudan’s fragile medical system and amplifying the humanitarian toll of the conflict.

Continue Reading

Trending