Connect with us

America

“Fighting is Harmful” China Assesses Supreme Court Tariff Blow to Trump

Published

on

China’s Commerce Ministry said it is assessing the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down Trump tariffs, amid Trump’s announcement of a 10% tariff, later raised to 15%. The dispute adds uncertainty ahead of U.S.-China talks in late March.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to invalidate key tariffs imposed under emergency powers has triggered a rapid policy pivot in Washington and a measured but pointed response from Beijing, injecting fresh volatility into global trade relations.

Court Curbs Emergency Tariff Authority

On February 20, the Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump overstepped his authority by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose broad tariffs.

The Court said tariff power belongs to Congress, and the IEEPA cannot be stretched to justify sweeping trade duties.

The ruling struck down many tariffs central to Trump’s global trade war, including measures targeting China and several Asian export economies.

Beijing Signals Strategic Restraint

China’s Commerce Ministry said Monday it is conducting a “full assessment” of the ruling. “U.S. unilateral tariffs violate international trade rules and U.S. domestic law, and are not in the interests of any party,” the ministry said.

“Cooperation between China and the United States is beneficial to both sides, but fighting is harmful.” The ministry added that China would “continue to pay close attention” and “firmly safeguard its interests.”

Trump’s proposed tariffs rely on Section 122, a provision that permits duties of up to 15% but limits their duration to 150 days without congressional approval. No president has previously invoked Section 122, and legal experts expect further challenges.

Policy Volatility, Market Shock

Within hours of the supreme court ruling, Trump signaled a policy shift, stating that “all national security tariffs under Section 232 and all existing Section 301 tariffs remain fully in place and in full force and effect.”

He added that he would sign an order imposing “a 10% global tariff under Section 122, over and above our normal tariffs already being charged.”

The shift underscored the administration’s urgency to preserve leverage after the Court’s constraints on IEEPA-based tariffs.

Meanwhile China’s state-run Global Times quoted Gao Lingyun of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences describing recent U.S. tariff decisions as “highly arbitrary” and a “political weapon,” adding that “Tariff policy should be based on rigorous assessment, not political preference.”

Allies And Partners Respond

South Korea said it would continue consultations with Washington to maintain a “balance of interests.” Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan cited concern across sectors including cars, batteries, and semiconductors.

India delayed a planned trade delegation to Washington amid uncertainty. Under a provisional framework, U.S. tariffs on Indian goods were set to fall to 18%, while India committed to purchasing $500 billion in U.S. goods over five years.

In Europe, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde warned on CBS’ Face the Nation that renewed tariff disruptions risk compounding business uncertainty. “To sort of shake it up again is going to bring about disruptions,” she said.

Trade and tariff policy are expected to dominate the agenda ahead of Trump’s anticipated visit to China in late March and early April, where he is scheduled to meet President Xi Jinping.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

America

Trump Wants to Punish Spain & NATO Allies Over Iran War

Published

on

A Pentagon email has revealed the U.S. has outlined options to punish NATO allies for not supporting the war on Iran, including suspending Spain, amid growing European defiance of U.S. policy & a parallel push by EU countries to deepen ties with China.

Washington is weighing punitive measures against NATO partners it views as unwilling to support operations in the Iran war, according to an internal Pentagon policy email.

The memo, circulating at senior Pentagon levels, frames access, basing and overflight rights as “just the absolute baseline for NATO,” according to a U.S. official who talked to Reuters for its exclusive. It proposes suspending “difficult” countries from key alliance roles, with Spain specifically identified due to its refusal to allow bases or airspace to be used for strikes on Iran.

Spain hosts two major U.S. installations – Naval Station Rota and Morón Air Base – making its stance operationally relevant even if suspension would be largely symbolic in military terms.

One option includes suspending Spain from NATO structures, while another suggests reassessing U.S. diplomatic support for British control of the Falkland Islands, a dispute dating back to the 1982 war in which 650 Argentine and 255 British personnel were killed.

The measures aim to reduce what officials describe as a European “sense of entitlement,” signaling frustration with allies that declined to support U.S. naval operations to reopen the Strait of Hormuz after the war began on Feb. 28.

Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson said allies “were not there for us,” adding the department would ensure options to make partners “do their part.”

President Donald Trump has echoed this view, asking, “Wouldn’t you if you were me?” when discussing potential U.S. withdrawal from NATO.

He also criticized Spain directly, saying, “Their financial numbers… are absolutely horrendous,” accusing them of contributing little to NATO defense.

Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez rejected the report, stating governments “do not work off emails.”

In parallel, Spain has continued its anti-war stance. They have pushed to suspend the EU-Israel agreement, citing alleged breaches of international law, though Euronews said the effort lacks consensus, with Germany and Italy opposing it.

Meanwhile president Sánchez, speaking in China, said Europe should “strengthen ties with China,” reflecting broader strategic divergence within the alliance.

The dispute comes as NATO, now 76 years old, faces questions about cohesion. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth complained Nato wouldn’t be much of an alliance if members hesitate to act, noting Iran’s missiles can reach Europe even if not the United States.

The Iran war, now in its eighth week, has exposed divisions over risk-sharing, military access, and the scope of alliance obligations, with policy options under review but no formal decisions announced.

Continue Reading

America

Budget Battle Begins: Trump Asks Congress $1.5 Trillion for War

Published

on

Trump proposed a record $1.5 trillion defense budget for 2027 amid Iran war, as costs reach $2B daily, sparking political backlash for rising debt & cuts on domestic spending.

The Trump administration’s proposed $1.5 trillion defense budget reflects the escalating financial demands of the Iran war while intensifying political and fiscal tensions in Washington.

The White House’s 2027 proposal seeks a more than 40 percent increase in defense spending, the sharpest rise since World War II.

U.S. media cited closed-door briefings estimating the Iran war may be costing up to $2 billion per day as the conflict enters its fifth week.

The plan allocates over $1.1 trillion through standard appropriations, with an additional $350 billion via a party-line mechanism.

Recent losses underline the scale of military strain. According to EGYOSINT, U.S. assets hit include 4 F-15E Strike Eagles, 1 A-10 shot down, and 17 MQ-9 Reaper drones destroyed.

Other reported losses include 1 E-3G Sentry (Airborne Early Warning and Control – AEW&C) aircraft destroyed, 8 KC-135 tankers damaged or lost, and multiple helicopters including UH-60 Black Hawk and HH-60G Pave Hawk variants.

These losses add pressure to replenish stockpiles and sustain operational tempo.

Trump framed the increase as necessary, stating federal resources must prioritize “military protection” over domestic programs.

Democrats sharply criticized the proposal. Senator Jack Reed said: “The U.S. Department of Defense doesn’t lack funding, but it currently lacks responsible civilian leadership & management.”

To offset costs, the administration proposes $73 billion in non-defense cuts, about 10 percent, while boosting law enforcement funding by over $40 billion.

The U.S. already faces annual deficits near $2 trillion and total debt exceeding $39 trillion, raising concerns about long-term sustainability.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said: “Trump’s budget is Rotten To The Core,” adding it prioritizes “bombs in the Middle East” over domestic needs.

Some Republicans support the plan, aiming to push defense spending toward 5 percent of GDP, while others warn of deepening fiscal imbalances.

Congress retains authority to modify or reject the proposal, setting up a contentious budget process.

The scale of the request highlights the trade-off between wartime demands and domestic priorities, as lawmakers weigh immediate military needs against rising debt and political opposition.

Continue Reading

America

Iran-linked Hackers Breach FBI Director’s Personal Email

Published

on

The personal email of FBI Director Kash Patel has been compromised by an Iran-linked hacking group, with the U.S. Department of Justice confirming the breach as concerns grow over escalating cyber tensions.

The U.S. Department of Justice confirmed that the email account of FBI Director Kash Patel had been compromised, following claims by a hacking group with alleged ties to Iran. The incident marks a significant cybersecurity concern involving a top U.S. intelligence official.

Officials at the Department of Justice acknowledged the breach but declined to provide further details about the scope or potential impact. The confirmation comes after the hackers publicly claimed responsibility and began releasing materials online.

A group calling itself “Handala Hack Team” said it had accessed Patel’s personal email inbox and published photos along with what it described as his resume. In a statement posted online, the group declared that Patel had joined its list of “successfully hacked victims.”

Cybersecurity firm Cyble described the group as an emerging but increasingly visible threat actor since late 2023, primarily targeting Israeli-linked entities and organizations.

While the hackers have released samples of the alleged data, Reuters reported it could not independently verify the authenticity of the emails. However, initial reviews suggest the material may include a mix of personal and professional correspondence dating from 2010 to 2019.

Continue Reading

Trending