Connect with us

Middle East

Iran’s President Blames Mismanagement, Not U.S.

Published

on

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, speaking during a provincial visit in 2024, said public dissatisfaction is the government’s fault, not the U.S., citing mismanagement, waste, and policy failures as protests pressure Tehran to deliver reforms.

Accountability Over External Blame

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has delivered one of the clearest acknowledgments yet by a sitting Iranian leader that public anger reflects domestic failure rather than foreign pressure. Speaking during a visit to Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province, Pezeshkian said dissatisfaction among citizens should be laid squarely at the feet of the government. “If people are dissatisfied, we are to blame—not America or anyone else,” he said. “It is our responsibility to manage resources properly, improve efficiency and productivity, and solve the people’s problems.” Iranian media reported the remarks amid ongoing protests and economic strain, framing them as a directive to officials to stop deflecting responsibility outward.

The statement matters less for its novelty than for its clarity. Iranian leaders frequently cite sanctions and U.S. policy as the primary drivers of inflation, shortages, and social pressure. Pezeshkian explicitly rejected that reflex. “If people are not satisfied, this is our fault,” he said, adding that officials should not seek refuge in blaming Washington or unnamed external actors. The emphasis signals an internal diagnostic: governance, not geopolitics, is the binding constraint.

“Do Not Be Wasteful”

Pezeshkian anchored his critique in practical examples of waste and mismanagement observed firsthand. He described a single room where “14 lights” were left on when “one would have been enough,” and heating so excessive that a window had been left open, squandering energy. The anecdote was not incidental. It illustrated his broader point that inefficiency compounds scarcity in an economy already under stress. Quoting the Qur’an, he reminded officials: “Eat and drink, but do not be wasteful; for Allah does not love the wasteful.”

The president framed resource discipline as both an economic and moral obligation. He warned that routine excess—whether in energy use, procurement, or budgeting—undermines the state’s capacity to deliver services. In a country of more than one administrative layer and thousands of public buildings, such small lapses scale quickly. His message was directed at governors, managers, and financial deputies, naming each role explicitly to underscore accountability across the chain.

Governance as Moral Test

Pezeshkian cast the crisis in ethical terms, linking administrative failure to religious duty. “According to the Qur’an, if we fail to solve the people’s problems, we will end up in hell,” he said. The language was stark and deliberate. By invoking scripture, he reframed governance failures as a test not only of competence but of faith and national responsibility. “The challenges we face are a test—for our managers, for us as Muslims, and as Iranians,” he said, calling for an awakening and a “new course” for the country.

The appeal blended civic nationalism and religious obligation, a familiar Iranian rhetorical pairing, but with a notable shift in emphasis. Rather than mobilizing resistance to external pressure, Pezeshkian urged internal reform, arguing that determination must replace hopelessness. He said Iran could secure a “bright future” if officials committed to building collectively and correcting failures rooted in poor management.

Policy Signals on Currency Controls

Beyond rhetoric, Pezeshkian pointed to a concrete policy change: the government has decided to end a system that provided importers of certain goods with foreign currency at a state-set, lower exchange rate. While details were limited, the announcement signals a willingness to confront distortions that have long fueled rent-seeking and inefficiency. Preferential rates, applied unevenly across sectors, have been criticized for encouraging waste and arbitrage rather than productivity.

The move aligns with his broader critique. Subsidized access to hard currency, like excessive energy use, reflects a mindset that tolerates leakage. By highlighting both behavioral lapses—14 lights in one room, an open window in winter—and structural fixes, Pezeshkian sketched a governance agenda centered on discipline. The test, as he framed it, is execution. Responsibility, he insisted, “is ours.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Middle East

Iran Puts Uranium Enrichment on the Negotiating Table

Published

on

Iran is effectively living under war conditions and is prepared for all scenarios, a senior advisor to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said, while signalling that Tehran could reduce uranium enrichment from 60% to 20% if it receives concessions in return.

Ali Shamkhani, a senior advisor to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said Iran’s nuclear programme remains entirely peaceful and rejected claims that uranium enriched to 60% is intended for military use.

Speaking to Lebanon-based Al-Mayadeen television, Shamkhani said Iran could lower its uranium enrichment level from 60% to 20%, a move long sought by Western powers, but stressed that such a step would require a “price”.

Enrichment at 60% can be reduced to 20%, but it must come at a price. We do not know exactly how much enriched uranium remains, because some of it is buried under rubble and has not been recovered due to the risks involved.

Ali Shamkhani, Senior Advisor of Iran’s Supreme Leader

He said Iran has no intention of transferring its enriched uranium abroad, adding that this option is now “completely off the table”.

“We Are Living in the Shadow of War”

Shamkhani described Iran’s current situation as one shaped by constant pressure and the threat of conflict, saying the country is already living under wartime conditions.

He said Iran’s enemies have imposed unjust conditions, unjust threats and an unjust war environment, while preparing for confrontation with all their strength. According to Shamkhani, Tehran is therefore ready for any possible scenario.

Europe Sidelined, US Seen as Sole Counterpart

Shamkhani said Europe has been effectively sidelined from the nuclear process since former US president Donald Trump withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal in 2018.

He said European countries were unable to play any meaningful role either after the withdrawal or during negotiations held ahead of last June’s conflict. According to Shamkhani, Trump did not allow European parties to intervene in the process.

As a result, Shamkhani said the nuclear issue can only be discussed directly with the United States and strictly within the framework of nuclear negotiations, adding that reaching an agreement with Washington remains possible.

Uncertainty Over Uranium Stockpiles

Shamkhani also said Iran does not know exactly how much enriched uranium it currently holds. He said part of the stockpile is buried under rubble and has not been recovered due to the risks involved.

No steps have been taken to extract those materials so far, he added, citing safety concerns.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Iran–US Talks to Be Held in Istanbul on February 6

Published

on

Iran and the United States are set to hold high-level talks in Istanbul on February 6 as efforts intensify to revive stalled nuclear negotiations. The meeting will bring together senior officials alongside key regional actors amid rising geopolitical tensions.

According to diplomats speaking to Reuters, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi will meet in Istanbul on Friday, February 6, in a renewed attempt to revive nuclear negotiations between Tehran and Washington.

A regional diplomat said the talks will include bilateral, trilateral and multilateral formats, reflecting a broader diplomatic push to prevent further escalation.

Regional Actors Join the Process

The same diplomat noted that Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and several other countries will participate in the Istanbul talks, underscoring regional efforts to support diplomacy.

Iran’s Fars News Agency, citing a government official, reported that President Masoud Pezeshkian has instructed officials to initiate negotiations with the United States over Iran’s nuclear program.

Mixed Signals From Washington

US President Donald Trump said on Monday that he remained optimistic about reaching an agreement but warned that “bad things could happen to Iran” if talks fail.

Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Secretary Ali Larijani said a negotiation framework had already been established, rejecting media speculation about an imminent military conflict.

Contrary to the war scenarios being promoted in the media, we are making progress on the structural arrangements for negotiations.

Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Secretary Ali Larijani

An Iranian official told Reuters that diplomacy is ongoing, but stressed that Washington must reduce its military presence in the region for talks to formally begin, adding: “The ball is now in Trump’s court.”

Russia Renews Uranium Proposal

Russia has also stepped in to support de-escalation efforts. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Moscow has reiterated its offer to take Iran’s enriched uranium, convert it into fuel for civilian nuclear reactors and store it as part of a broader confidence-building measure.

However, Iran’s semi-official Tasnim News Agency reported that officials from the Supreme National Security Council remain opposed to sending enriched uranium abroad. Deputy Secretary Ali Bagheri Kani said the proposal would not be discussed in potential talks with Washington.

Escalating Tensions and Diplomatic Traffic

Diplomatic activity has intensified amid fears that Iran–US tensions could spill into a regional conflict. Trump sparked speculation in January by saying “help is on the way” following protests in Iran, comments that were widely interpreted as signaling possible military action.

The US later deployed the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln to the Middle East under CENTCOM’s area of responsibility. On January 28, Trump again urged Tehran to return to nuclear talks, warning that any future military action would be “far worse” than US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites in June 2025.

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards were expected to conduct naval drills in the Strait of Hormuz on February 1, but the exercise was subsequently canceled.

Türkiye Offers Facilitation Role

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has warned that a US attack on Iran would trigger a regional war.

Meanwhile, diplomatic engagement between Ankara and Tehran has intensified. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan met Araghchi on January 29, emphasizing the importance of returning to the negotiating table. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan followed up with a phone call to President Pezeshkian on January 30.

According to Türkiye’s Communications Directorate, Erdoğan told his Iranian counterpart that Ankara is ready to play a facilitating role between Iran and the United States. Erdoğan later met Araghchi in person during the Iranian minister’s visit to Türkiye.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Rafah Crossing Will Reopen On Sunday

Published

on

Israel said it will reopen Gaza’s Rafah crossing on Sunday for limited civilian movement under Israeli inspection, EU supervision, and Egyptian coordination.

Israeli authorities say the crossing, closed for nearly two years, will reopen on Sunday for limited civilian transit only, tightly controlled by Israeli security procedures.

The reopening aligns with provisions outlined in the second phase of the ceasefire agreement, though no firm timetable for broader implementation has been announced.

The Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT), an Israeli defense ministry body, said on Friday that “exit from and entry into the Gaza Strip via the Rafah Crossing will be permitted in coordination with Egypt, following prior security clearance of individuals by Israel, and under the supervision of the European Union mission.”

COGAT added that the mechanism would mirror arrangements used in January 2025, including an additional screening and identification process at a corridor under Israeli military control.

“Limited Manner, Full Inspection”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu underscored the security-first approach on Jan 28, stating, “We agreed to open the Rafah crossing in a limited manner, and only with our inspection.”

He added that it will be for people only, in limited numbers, and “everyone who exits or enters will undergo our inspection – a full inspection.”

Israeli officials say the initial phase will allow dozens of Palestinians per day in each direction, prioritizing medical evacuees and civilians displaced during the war.

An Israeli official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told The Associated Press that movement would begin with cases approved in advance, including wounded civilians and those requiring specialized medical care unavailable in Gaza. According to Gaza’s health ministry, roughly 20,000 sick and wounded Palestinians currently require treatment outside the enclave, where hospitals and surgical capacity were severely degraded during the conflict.

Humanitarian Pressure at the Crossing

Rafah has historically been the primary gateway between Gaza and Egypt and a critical conduit for humanitarian access. Gaza is home to approximately 2 million people, many displaced multiple times and facing shortages of food, shelter, and medicine. Thousands inside Gaza are seeking to leave, while tens of thousands who fled earlier phases of fighting are seeking to return. Under the announced plan, only Palestinians who left Gaza during the war will be permitted to re-enter, and only after Israeli security clearance coordinated with Egypt.

Hamas responded by calling for full implementation of the ceasefire terms, urging Israel to open the crossing “in both directions without restrictions.” Israeli officials, however, maintain that control of Rafah remains a security imperative, particularly following the return of the remains of the last Israeli captive earlier this week, which concluded a core component of the ceasefire’s first phase.

External Oversight, Narrow Scope

The reopening will take place under the supervision of the European Union Border Assistance Mission, with Egypt coordinating on its side of the crossing. While the arrangement restores a degree of civilian movement after nearly 24 months of closure, Israeli statements make clear that Rafah will not function as an unrestricted border. The scope is limited to people, not goods, and all transit remains subject to Israeli approval.

The record on the ground appears to be far worse. An infographic by Anadolu Agency reporting shows Israel committed 1,244 ceasefire violations in Gaza after the truce took effect on October 10, 2025, resulting in 449 Palestinian deaths and 1,246 injuries. The report cites major restrictions on aid deliveries, and a shelter crisis affecting more than 1.5 million displaced people during winter conditions, claiming that Israel’s compliance only amounted to 12% of the provisions of the ceasefire deal.

Continue Reading

Trending